Người Việt sẽ gặp họa lớn nếu không phải ông Trump làm tổng thống

[Gibbs]

Chuyện gì sẽ xảy ra nếu không phải ông Trump làm tổng thống? Hàng triệu người di dân bất hợp pháp sẽ kéo vào nước Mỹ. Khủng bố đội lốt tị nạn đạo Hồi đánh bom toàn quốc. Tệ nạn xã hội leo thang, tội phạm ma túy tăng gia, trợ cấp cho người di dân bất hợp pháp sẽ là gánh nặng đánh sụp nền kinh tế Mỹ. Không những vậy, kinh tế khó khăn sẽ tăng thêm sự kỳ thị màu da và chủng tộc mà người Việt sinh sống tại Mỹ sẽ là cộng đồng hứng chịu hậu quả nặng nề nhất.



Ơn Chúa, chuyện này không xảy ra. Vì đâu? Ngài Trump !!! Với cú thắng cử tổng thống ngoạn mục, ngài Trump đã đem lại luồng gió mát tới cộng đồng người Việt. Với những biện pháp ông Trump sắp thực thi sẽ là một liều thuốc kích thích người Việt tại đất Hoa Kỳ có một tương lai rực rỡ. Khuyết điểm lớn nhất mỗi khi tổng thống mới lên mà người Việt hay lo lắng đó là tham nhũng, nhưng ở nơi ông Trump có thể đặt niềm tin một doanh nhân doanh giàu có sẽ không bao giờ tham nhũng. Cố vấn của Trump là Anthony Scaramucci nói "Trump là một người rất, rất tốt và ông ấy có thể điều hành đất nước thành công vì xung quanh luôn có những người tài giỏi". "Sự cao thượng của Trump cũng sẽ khiến tất cả mọi người bị sốc".

Những chương trình của ngài Trump xu hướng có lợi cho người Việt như sau:

1. Xây Vạn Lý Trường Thành Trump, ngăn chặn di dân bất hợp pháp từ Mexico, giảm tội phạm buôn ma túy.

2. Lôi kéo công việc về Mỹ, sẽ tạo ra 25 triệu việc làm mới trong thập niên tới cũng khiến người Việt có thể tìm việc dễ dàng hơn, giảm thất nghiệp.

3. Là một doanh nhân nên Trump rất hiểu gánh nặng của những doanh nghiệp buôn bán nhỏ và tầm trung của người Việt. Ông Trump sẽ giảm thuế và những ưu đãi doanh nghiệp buôn bán nhỏ khiến công việc kinh doanh của người Việt thuận lợi hơn.

4. Rút khỏi TPP, tránh sập bẫy Việt Cộng, những kẻ đang muốn chia rẽ và mưu đồ tiêu diệt cộng đồng người Việt Hải Ngoại.

5. Gói kích thích kinh tế 1000 tỷ USD sẽ giúp Hoa Kỳ phát triển tốt hơn.

6. Về chính sách đối ngoại, trong chiến dịch tranh cử ông Trump từng cam kết nếu ông đắc cử, chính phủ Mỹ sẽ không can thiệp vào công việc nội bộ của các nước khác. Với tuyên bố này, người ta có thể kỳ vọng, nước Mỹ dưới thời ông Trump sẽ không sa lầy vào các cuộc chiến “tốn người, hao của”. Ông cũng có thể giúp nước Mỹ tiết kiệm được hàng tỷ USD khi đề nghị các đồng minh phải chia sẻ gánh nặng chi phí đảm bảo an ninh toàn cầu.

Tỷ phú Warren Buffett, người được mệnh danh là “Nhà tiên tri xứ Omaha” và cũng là người từng ủng hộ bà Hillary Clinton trong chiến dịch tranh cử, đã lên tiếng cho rằng Tổng thống đắc cử Donald Trump “xứng đáng được tất cả mọi người tôn trọng”. Chúc ông Trump thành công.

Originally Posted by corumstation

Under the anti nepotism Federal Postal Act of 1967, Trump children and son-in-law cannot serve directly in the executive branch as currently apply. However, they can head task forces or serve as unofficial “czars” with policy portfolios like Hillary did in the Health Reform Task Force in 1993

See? There. That is what I call "Beauty with brains".

Originally Posted by whuynh

Again, you're repeating yourself here. This is the transitional time. His children are allowed to help their father, and that's constituted because it's a part of his Presidency campaign.

But he is not vested to appoint any of his family members to certain positions in government, including the Cabinet.

In response to that, Congress passed a law in 1967 that prohibits federal officials from appointing family members to certain positions in government, including the Cabinet. So, no, TRUMP cannot appoint a family member to the Cabinet. It's written in our constitution.

Thank you for your knowledgeable info.

However, you are saying các đài truyền hình CNN, MSNBC đều sai khi họ khẳng định Trump & his family have too much conflicts of interest.

Originally Posted by whuynh

See? There. That is what I call "Beauty with brains".

that's a guy hahahaha

BTW, I love this thread; I love that you guys debate the different political points for me to learn from:handsha ke:

Originally Posted by whuynh

NOTE: I'm just saying this as an American (not as Trump's or Hillary's supporter). My point of view is whoever won the Election, that person won it fair and square. It's time to put our differences aside and do what we should do best for the benefits of our country.

This is where you were wrong about me. Trump won fair and square, and I will be a good citizen (work & pay taxes). But differences are what make human being evolved and developed.

"However, you are saying các đài truyền hình CNN, MSNBC đều sai khi họ khẳng định Trump & his family have too much conflicts of interest" --> vkz

1) No, CNN & MSNBC wasn't around when this was enacted to mainly fight the danger of John Kennedy appointing his brother, Robert, as AG. And it also has been applicable under prior administrations and members of Congress.

2) Doesn't matter who got the scoop first! It's still written down as law and in the history books!

Originally Posted by vkz

Thank you for your knowledgeable info.

However, you are saying các đài truyền hình CNN, MSNBC đều sai khi họ khẳng định Trump & his family have too much conflicts of interest.

I don't say this because I don't like Trump or take side with any party. But I think those TV Networks are a bit of biased. Just like when you watch FOX NEWS channel, would you say the same thing?

I hear you and I think you have some valid points too. As a matter of fact, Trump won and we all (including you) should accept it and move on. If Trump was going to be a slop then you will have a chance to vote for someone else you think better. Please be an American first before being a Democrat.

Me? I support all American who do best for the country regardless Republicans or Democrats.

Originally Posted by corumstation

2) Doesn't matter who got the scoop first! It's still written down as law and in the history books!

Laws & History are sometimes proven to be very wrong in the past. But this is another topic for another time.

Originally Posted by laughster

that's a guy hahahaha

BTW, I love this thread; I love that you guys debate the different political points for me to learn from:handsha ke:

really? It's a dude? Man, I've gotta get rid of this avatar out of my dream .

Originally Posted by vkz

This is where you were wrong about me. Trump won fair and square, and I will be a good citizen (work & pay taxes). But differences are what make human being evolved and developed.

Die-hard, huh? I can respect that.

Originally Posted by whuynh

really? It's a dude? Man, I've gotta get rid of this avatar out of my dream .

that pic is of a famous Chinese singer or something haha. Anh cha12ba pointed out one time; her name is xu chin something (it kinda rhymes with sú chen hahaha because I remember cracking up about it hahahha)

"Laws & History are sometimes proven to be very wrong in the past. But this is another topic for another time" --> vkz

1) Wrong? ... But view from what perspectives? And base upon what judgement standards?

2) Facts --> it's currently a law & has occurred in history. Unless you're talking about Schrödinger's cat

Originally Posted by laughster

that pic is of a famous Chinese singer or something haha. Anh cha12ba pointed out one time; her name is xu chin something (it kinda rhymes with sú chen hahaha because I remember cracking up about it hahahha)

Social Media is so deceiving, you think?

Originally Posted by corumstation

"Laws & History are sometimes proven to be very wrong in the past. But this is another topic for another time" --> vkz

1) Wrong? ... But view from what perspectives? And base upon what judgement standards?

2) Facts --> it's currently a law & has occurred in history. Unless you're talking about Schrödinger's cat

You mean the Racial segregation in the United States, A Century of Racial Segregation 1849–1950 was just and right?

This is just one example of many laws written down in the past were very very wrong.

Originally Posted by whuynh

Social Media is so deceiving, you think?

well, you assumed that avatar is corumstation, and he never claimed that' the pic is hers hahaha LMAO you know what happens when you assume hahahahah

BTW, what's your wife's phone number?? I am going to tattle on you hahaha tối nay bị bả bắt quỳ gối trên vỏ trái sầu riêng cho coi hahahaha

"You mean the Racial segregation in the United States, A Century of Racial Segregation 1849–1950 was just and right?
This is just one example of many laws written down in the past were very very wrong" --> vkz

1) From their perspective --> Yes

2) From yours --> No

Originally Posted by laughster

well, you assumed that avatar is corumstation, and he never claimed that' the pic is hers hahaha LMAO you know what happens when you assume hahahahah

BTW, what's your wife's phone number?? I am going to tattle on you hahaha tối nay bị bả bắt quỳ gối trên vỏ trái sầu riêng cho coi hahahaha

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh LOL.

Originally Posted by corumstation

"You mean the Racial segregation in the United States, A Century of Racial Segregation 1849–1950 was just and right?
This is just one example of many laws written down in the past were very very wrong" --> vkz

1) From their perspective --> Yes

2) From yours --> No

Since you brought it up. What is your perspective? You agreed Racial Segregation was the right thing to do.

Originally Posted by laughster

well, you assumed that avatar is corumstation, and he never claimed that' the pic is hers hahaha LMAO you know what happens when you assume hahahahah

BTW, what's your wife's phone number?? I am going to tattle on you hahaha tối nay bị bả bắt quỳ gối trên vỏ trái sầu riêng cho coi hahahaha

"tối nay bị bả bắt quỳ gối trên vỏ trái sầu riêng"..

Talking from experience eh..Hahaha...poor you bro Laughster..

Originally Posted by SlyGuy

"tối nay bị bả bắt quỳ gối trên vỏ trái sầu riêng"..

Talking from experience eh..Hahaha...poor you bro Laughster..

hahaha vỏ sầu riêng thì chưa, vỏ trái mít thì yes hahahha :nan a:

"Since you brought it up. What is your perspective? You agreed Racial Segregation was the right thing to do" --> vkz

1) Personally ... Hell No!

2) From a historical, economics and enlightenment at that time period, it was an empirical decision!